Quote:
Originally Posted by jozman3000
Look man, it's not going to be perfect since I'm picking up on the task here.
|
I'm sorry if it looks like I am trying be a butt head. I'm just trying to make sense of this, as you know I am not the best when reading things and 90% of the time read it wrongly. Again sorry you feel that I am trying to give you a headache.
Quote:
Mathematical error is the reason for the points not being correct. I already spend all morning trying to get it right and I'm a bit flustered with this now.
|
Thank you for stepping up on this Joz! I am in no means trying to cause you to get flustered but right now it's confusing as heck compared to 2007 and trying to understand it is only confusing me more.
Quote:
The point difference is what like 2 or 3 points? It's a trivial amount and the adjustments needed to fix it might cause more errors. I say we just keep it as it is now and I'll stay on top of the ball from now on.
|
Perhaps we can ask Kong to explain it? Maybe we both are understanding this wrongly?
---------- Post added at 03:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:33 PM ----------
@Joz: I should have 36 points, only one that has an issue now.
Pac-Man: Pac Attack - Old High Score 2,036,010. Set on 02-29-2008 by
Ashums.
Should be added to my total giving 51.