Happy Canada Day! - Page 2

**Slime Slayer** · 07-01-2010, 07:34 PM

American women:

Canadian women:
NSFW:

( Click to show/hide )

nuff said.

**Demon-Mask** · 07-01-2010, 09:31 PM

Now I want to defect to Canada Steven... Damn it!

**Dudebro** · 07-01-2010, 09:40 PM

Oh sure, we all know Canada is full of blonde supermodels who kind of look like trashy porn stars.

Who knew you could wear bikinis in the constant winter that is canada.

**Demon-Mask** · 07-01-2010, 09:43 PM

Well, I'd assume you'd get used to the constant winter and be able to wear bikinis, or they took anti-freezing peptide shots before hand, or the bikinis have some special radiative heating system.
Or they are indoors at a heated location designed to look like the area outside of the location, sans-snow that is.

**Kugyince** · 07-01-2010, 09:49 PM

Third from the left is a major butter face.

**Dudebro** · 07-01-2010, 09:52 PM

That's why she's wearing the skimpiest bikini. At least she knows her place right?

I just noticed you can't even see half of the bikini bottoms in the first picture, ugh.

**Slime Slayer** · 07-01-2010, 09:54 PM

I love how the fat one in the green has to wear that apron so you can tell she is wearing something down there.

**Kugyince** · 07-01-2010, 10:02 PM

Had to add spoiler tags and a NSFW warning to the bottom one.

**Dudebro** · 07-01-2010, 10:07 PM

That's funny Tenser, I think the top pic is much more offensive.

**Kugyince** · 07-01-2010, 10:30 PM

I'm not one to complain about hot chicas but it brings up an issue.

**samejamesbond** · 07-01-2010, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dudebro

That's funny Tenser, I think the top pic is much more offensive.

Agreed.

**Demon-Mask** · 07-02-2010, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dudebro

That's funny Tenser, I think the top pic is much more offensive.

I agree, it would also need spoilers on the same rule that warrants the second one needing one.
You can't just hide one and not the other, though I'm not the one allowed to interpret the rules, that's up to you, Tenser, Sabby or Kong.
It just seems fairly demeaning to hide one because it is sexually orientated, and somehow a picture of a similar nature, sans-attractiveness, doesn't qualify as sexually orientated.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forum Rules

Do not post obscene, vulgar, sexually-orientated, hateful, threatening, racist, sexist or discriminatory messages, links or images.

I really don't want to sound rude, but the rules shouldn't be applied to some cases and ignored for others.

**Slime Slayer** · 07-02-2010, 02:45 AM

There is one small, round fleshy difference between the photos.

**Dudebro** · 07-02-2010, 02:51 AM

I was kidding DM. Tenser put it in a spoiler because of a wardrobe malfunction.

**Kugyince** · 07-02-2010, 03:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demon-Mask

I agree, it would also need spoilers on the same rule that warrants the second one needing one.
You can't just hide one and not the other, though I'm not the one allowed to interpret the rules, that's up to you, Tenser, Sabby or Kong.
It just seems fairly demeaning to hide one because it is sexually orientated, and somehow a picture of a similar nature, sans-attractiveness, doesn't qualify as sexually orientated.

I really don't want to sound rude, but the rules shouldn't be applied to some cases and ignored for others.

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevencassidy13

There is one small, round fleshy difference between the photos.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dudebro

I was kidding DM. Tenser put it in a spoiler because of a wardrobe malfunction.

@DM: How's that foot taste?