Yeah I disagreed with one of mine too. The wording was tricky and meant to catch people imo. But still a fun test I thought. This is from the FAQ...
Quote:
11. Ridiculous - the questions are all open to various interpretations.
This is a bit of an odd objection. I mean, obviously, questions are open to interpretation - and, indeed, we try very hard in this activity not to force particular intepretations of God, omnipotence, etc., on people. [If there wasn't any room for interpretation, we'd get complaints about forcing people down fixed routes; actually, come to think of it, we do get complaints about this!]. It doesn't follow that as a consequence, the activity has no relevance in terms of finding out about the internal coherence of a set of beliefs. The point, of course, is that you know how you interpreted the question. Therefore, you're in a position to judge whether the hits and bullets are fair given the way that you interpreted it. Sometimes you'll conclude that they are - sometimes you'll conclude that they aren't.
|
They admit that it's not perfect. I think it's a good test, shows how some logic is flawed.