[david man45]

No, what you imply is that because someone is starving to death you threaten another's life to feed him. People don't deserve a 'fair start' etc. I would choose the more fair system, not arbitrarily beating up the successful because I'm part of an unwashed mass.

Socialism is as far from freedom as you can get, democracy puts your idiot neighbors in charge, with sound money the kings or lords will be in charge for a reason, unlike this entirely bezzle economy that runs on perpetual debt. The guy with a hamburger sees a starving man, he destroys it away after the starving man asks for it, would you decide to enact violence on him because of this? Im not saying its wrong to help the needy or demonizing them, my point is that socialism promotes being poor, and is not morally upheld. Its a disgusting system.

Everyone *isn't* a special snowflake, you *don't* deserve any standards of living, and its up to you to make it or not. You're alone on an island what do you do? Work. Handicapped or mentally ill? You die. When you really get down to it, if the money is sound, and by that I mean almost literally bitcoin (accountability, impossible to steal or counterfeit, etc), then you will see a ruling class emerge, and they will be there for the right reasons. No king who starts bullshit wars and wastes and impoverishes his kingdom will be a king for long, you know?

And as far as the whole capitalism will lead to corporations having more power than votes.. good. A bribe run system is more desired than democracy, and corporations themselves are a product of the state and the bezzle economy.

---------- Post added at 10:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 PM ----------

Pretty much the importance of people will be determined on their holdings of wealth, the way it should be.