View Full Version : Who is the most over-rated band of all time?
Slime Slayer
02-05-2014, 12:48 AM
I never thought either of these 2 bands were deserving of the attention they got, and still get today.
RU Joe
02-05-2014, 01:15 AM
I vote for both of those and raise you a KISS and an AC/DC.
http://www.retrouprising.com/img/2014_02/3235.jpg
Never liked either of those myself although I'm probably setting myself up for a severe beating.
While I'm at it I may as well trash Guns N' Roses, Nirvana, and yes, even Van Halen as bands I felt were overrated - but in the case of Van Halen it was because of David Lee Roth. :face:
Of all these I feel KISS to be the most over - rated : their songs are boring and repetitive, and lack musical finesse - all of this being just my opinion.
I'll probably come up with a few more later on. xxp
samejamesbond
02-05-2014, 01:26 AM
U2 is more overrated than those two combined in my opinion.
The Beatles did have some amazing material on their later albums and the
Stone made Exile on Main Street which is one of the greatest roots albums
I have ever heard.
I never heard anything by U2 that impressed me. It just sounded really
safe with delayed guitar and Bono's monotone.
Slime Slayer
02-05-2014, 01:34 AM
U2 is more overrated than those two combined in my opinion.
The Beatles did have some amazing material on their later albums and the
Stone made Exile on Main Street which is one of the greatest roots albums
I have ever heard.
I never heard anything by U2 that impressed me. It just sounded really
safe with delayed guitar and Bono's monotone.
Are you nuts? This songs first 5 seconds trump ANYTHING by the Beatles or the Stones.
U2 - Pride (In The Name Of Love) - YouTube
EDIT: It's about Jesus, In case anyone was curious, and no that's not why I like it. I firmly believe that creationists and atheists are equally retarded.
samejamesbond
02-05-2014, 01:47 AM
It just starts with the basic chords over and over again. The song builds
up to a middle piece with very light "uph" that it could have needed.
A song I absolutely love by the Stone is their song Let it Loose. It too
uses a simple introduction that ultimately builds up. But, in the Stones
case, a clever use of blues piano and gospel singers into an extended
bridge gives it a kick.
The Rolling Stones - Exile On Main Street - Let It Loose - YouTube
But I get where you're coming from on the overrated material, their early
stuff wasn't nearly as interesting or diverse. Plain old rock n roll is
good, but they didn't have the grit that acts like Elvis or Chuck Berry
had and it sounded a tad stale.
Slime Slayer
02-05-2014, 01:47 AM
Hell, Fleetwood Mac have better songs than them.
Fleetwood Mac - Go Your Own Way (HQ) - YouTube
samejamesbond
02-05-2014, 02:29 AM
I also don't like Fleetwood Mac all that much. Much like my problems with
U2 though, I always find that the songs never do enough to hold my
interest and Stevie Nicks can be flat when she should put more emotion
into her songs.
Like listen to Meat Loaf, the guy can sell a song with incredible emotion
about how boring and average things are in his life:
Meatloaf - Two Out Of Three Ain't bad Lyrics - YouTube
Or with powerful instrumentation like I Can't Quit Her by Blood, Sweat, and Tears:
Blood Sweat & Tears - I Can't Quit Her - YouTube
TodayIsForgotten
02-05-2014, 06:46 AM
Definitely the Beatles.
Ballas
02-05-2014, 06:56 AM
Guns N' Roses, Nirvana
Wheres the beating button? :D
Dudebro
02-05-2014, 08:08 AM
Kiss blows. One of the worst bands ever.
I voted for the Beatles because they are held up as some rock gods and really they're just a boy band, at least at first. I can only listen to a few of their songs and even then I'd rather be listening to someone else, like bob dylan or johnny cash, covering it.
U2 is also pretty overrated. They have some decent songs but they're another band that is put on a pedestal they don't deserve.
George Riley
02-05-2014, 09:12 AM
The Rolling Stones by far. Stage performance I'll give them the edge, but overall musical quality it was much more pizzazz than anything else.
TwinChargers
02-05-2014, 09:38 AM
While I think they are both fine bands, I'll give the edge to the Beatles as being more overrated since John died and a bands greatness always rises when a vital member dies.
honestly ill just go with C: nirvana, yeah they werent bad, but EVERY one just LOVES them....
Kugyince
02-05-2014, 10:07 AM
Can't stand the Stones.
I do enjoy U2, especially the earlier stuff and I like a lot of the later stuff done by the Beatles.
D.B. Cooper
02-05-2014, 11:19 AM
My vote would be for U2 if the option was given. Drives me nuts that people actually think they are good. I put them in the same category as Bruce Springstein in that everyone seems to think they are great live just because they look like they're trying hard. Is there a more boring guitarist than The Edge?
I voted for the Beetles because most of their stuff is cheesy pop music and I still credit them as the original boy band. The Stones at least know how to jam and play a lot of blues and well, I like the blues. But I much prefer to listen to the Yardbirds and Led Zeppelin.
Slime Slayer
02-05-2014, 02:04 PM
I voted for the Rolling Stones, I don't find any of their "hits" are really great songs, just song after song of passable songwriting. They annoy me.
---------- Post added at 08:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:03 PM ----------
I like U2, and don't feel they are over rated, the general public doesn't hold them in nearly the high regard that the Stones and Beatles are in.
CrispyChicken
02-05-2014, 02:13 PM
KISS is more overrated than the both of them, but if I had to choose between the two, I'd say Rolling Stones. I'm a fan of the Beatles music, though they may be overrated I like them a lot more than the Rolling Stones.
D.B. Cooper
02-05-2014, 02:44 PM
I like U2, and don't feel they are over rated, the general public doesn't hold them in nearly the high regard that the Stones and Beatles are in.
I don't agree. U2 is regarded as the most successful band in the last 25 years. They may not be as old as the Beatles and the Stones but they hold the same iconic status. The 60's were for the Beatles and the Stones ruled the 70's but U2 ruled the 80's and 90's and even today they are probably still the biggest selling band in the world.
---------- Post added at 12:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:38 PM ----------
Here's an interesting link to the highest grossing concert tours of all time. U2's 360 tour leads the list but the Stones are right behind.
List of highest-grossing concert tours - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_concert_tours)
Kugyince
02-05-2014, 03:21 PM
U2 ranks 18th in the list of biggest selling artists of all time.
List of best-selling music artists - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_music_artists)
Abbreviated list:
1. Beatles
2. Elvis
3. Michael Jackson
4. Madonna
5. Elton John
6. Led Zeppelin
7. Pink Floyd
8. Mariah Carey
9. Celine Dion
10. Whitney Houston
11. AC/DC
12. Queen
13. Rolling Stones
14. ABBA
15. Garth Brooks
16. Eagles
17. Rihanna
18. U2
19. Billy Joel
20. Phil Collins
I'd like to make some enemies and claim that Led Zeppelin be included in most overrated bands.
Side notes:
21. Aerosmith
24. Genesis
27. Bruce Springsteen
31. Metallica
33. Eminem
37. Fleetwood Mac
39. Guns N' Roses
57. KISS
81. Nirvana
Not placed:
Creedence Clearwater Revival
kernzy
02-05-2014, 03:31 PM
cool link.
shame the real greats get overshadowed by teeny pop music, always will be the same.
maybe it is all about value? overpriced tickets are common place.
i vote stones in this poll. always liked the beatles, never the stones. beatles were just lucky to be there at the time.
used to be a U2 fan, now not, but the old stuff is still really good stuff, everything up to the joshua tree.. and the edge is boring!
and if you doubt ac/dc as over/under rated, check Angus Young on guitar, the best metal/blues guitarist alive (or dead) in my opinion.
check this. solo begins at 1:55, then a small gap, then blues/rock heaven on guitar starts at 3:15. check those slides and wobbles, when angus was just a wee boy. totally gifted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OPOc5QkJGY
RU Joe
02-05-2014, 04:43 PM
When it comes to musical preferences it seems that people have diverse tastes, which is good.
Studies have shown that listening to different kinds of music actually makes you smarter.
:arrogant:
But when if comes to the 'most popular' bands I think a lot of people just go along with the crowd, and that's what accounts for {given} band's popularity.
:meeting: {.. Du Jour is the best band ever!}
This, coupled with the fact that we're forced to listen to the same group of songs on public radio playlists for decades probably doesn't help.
:\
Case in point: someone told me they didn't like the Scorpions because their only good song was 'Rock you like a hurricane' .. then I told them about 'Big city nights', 'Coast to coast', 'Bad boys running wild', 'No one like you', etc.
and that person was surprised to learn they aren't just a '1- hit wonder'.
The other thing I think worth mentioning is peoples' personal association with music; for me, AC DC brings up bad memories and may account for why I don't like them so much.
Maybe the opposite could account for the popularity of bands like U2 {another un - favorite of mine}where people associate them with good memories?
Do your guys' personal associations with music make you feel certain things about bands?
I mean, aside from typical emotional responses to certain chord progressions, that is?
Sid seattle
02-05-2014, 04:58 PM
i think smashing pumpkins are and were the most overrated band of all time..or maybe even Janis Joplin...just saying.I love the doors,Bauhaus,CCR,Rainbow,Bowie
Slime Slayer
02-05-2014, 05:38 PM
The only time I wanna hear AC/DC is when I'm on a ride at the carnival. Otherwise, they suck.
RU Joe
02-05-2014, 06:14 PM
The only time I wanna hear AC/DC is when I'm on a ride at the carnival. Otherwise, they suck.
Me:
The other thing I think worth mentioning is peoples' personal association with music; for me, AC DC brings up bad memories and may account for why I don't like them so much.
I may as well just tell people:
It was when SC13 barfed on the crowd while riding the giant swings as AC DC was playing; I was in that crowd.
:snicker:
Slime Slayer
02-05-2014, 08:00 PM
Me:
I may as well just tell people:
It was when SC13 barfed on the crowd while riding the giant swings as AC DC was playing; I was in that crowd.
:snicker:
Yup, I did another 20 revolutions before the ride finished, seeing all of your faces staring at me each time with "you shook me all night long" playing was no fun for me either.
---------- Post added at 02:00 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:59 AM ----------
Me:
I may as well just tell people:
It was when SC13 barfed on the crowd while riding the giant swings as AC DC was playing; I was in that crowd.
:snicker:
Is there an actual story though?
Dudebro
02-05-2014, 09:37 PM
i think smashing pumpkins are and were the most overrated band of all time..or maybe even Janis Joplin...just saying.I love the doors,Bauhaus,CCR,Rainbow,Bowie
Well to be fair I doubt Janis Joplin would've cool with being known for those couple songs she made way back then. If she lived she probably would've stopped playing those songs at her concerts and matured musically.
Funny you mention the doors right after that, I think they are extremely overrated. They had some good songs but people treat them, or really just Morrison, as if they're gods. To me he wasn't really that great of a singer, a lot of his stuff is just spoken words with a cool soundtrack.
Agreed with U2. I never, ever understood what's so special about them. It's mostly just basic MTV-pop.
Ballas
02-05-2014, 11:55 PM
I think Beatles shouldn't be classified as a "boy band". They should fall under a band in my opinion, they actually made their own music with their own instruments unlike boy bands from the early '90s who had some computer backup on their side. That would be like saying Blink 182 is a boy band whereas I think they should fall under a proper band...
They also didn't have these stupid synchronized moves, damn that can irrtate me!!!
Sorry but I can't stand boy bands... :face::face::face:
RU Joe
02-06-2014, 02:19 AM
I think Beatles shouldn't be classified as a "boy band". They should fall under a band in my opinion, they actually made their own music with their own instruments unlike boy bands from the early '90s who had some computer backup on their side.
You've got a good point there about Beatles at least playing their own music.
Also I totally agree with you about 'boy bands', they're just annoying.
:face::face::face: ^ This, coupled with the 'computer backup', as you put it .. although I'm really into Electronic Music, that 'boy band' style lacks that finesse I talked about before.
http://www.retrouprising.com/img/2014_02/3242.jpg
IN case you don't know, 'Du Jour' means 'prepared for a given day' as in 'Soup of the day'
In other words, here today, gone tomorrow - nothing special.
Now that I've mentioned it, the movie 'Josie and The Pussycats' really hit the nail right on the head regarding the music industry in general.
Great show if you haven't seen it, excellent soundtrack too.
http://www.retrouprising.com/img/2014_02/3243.png
:in-love:
http://www.retrouprising.com/img/2014_02/3244.gif
;)
Ballas
02-10-2014, 05:37 AM
You've got a good point there about Beatles at least playing their own music.
although I'm really into Electronic Music, that 'boy band' style lacks that finesse I talked about before.
;)
I don't mind electronic music I love Linkin Park etc as well who use a lot of PC compiled stuff. As long as there is no synchronized dancers it's okay :-)
Demon-Mask
02-10-2014, 08:59 AM
I'd have to go with The Beatles here, purely because they're still talked about incessantly even today, even more so than the Rolling Stones, and their music, while in some ways innovative, outside of a few songs here and there, tended towards pretty bland, almost formulaic, pop music.
They do have some good songs, I just don't think they should be famous to the level they still are, y'know?
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.