View Full Version : Firefox 6
Tails
08-16-2011, 08:49 PM
Yet another new FF.. yay.
Anyone update yet?
Dudebro
08-16-2011, 08:51 PM
I usually refuse any new version for a while so no not yet.
yoshi_star10
08-16-2011, 08:51 PM
I didnt even Know there was one
Tails
08-16-2011, 08:57 PM
These are getting freaking ridiculous.
ZedIsDead
08-16-2011, 08:57 PM
It doesn't seem any different, aside from the fact that a good number of my add-ons are incompatible now.
CrispyChicken
08-16-2011, 09:06 PM
Just downloaded it. Thanks for the heads up Tails.
---------- Post added at 10:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:05 PM ----------
Doesn't seem to have affected ArcadeOX like the last FF update did.
Mareeps
08-16-2011, 09:38 PM
Does Adblock Plus still work?
Slime Slayer
08-16-2011, 09:45 PM
I hate those stupid messages that pop up everytime. Firefox does everything I want it to perfectly just as it is.
RU Joe
08-17-2011, 03:23 AM
What is the deal with all the updates, anyways?
And I gotta laugh: every time they come out with a new one, they tout it as being 'better, faster, more secure, more user - friendly'
blah blah blah ...
It's like they're admitting there's something wrong with the last one they said the exact same things about!
And what's worse = they do it again and again!
I think I'm using version 3....I only updated FF once since I installed it and that gave me problems at first. So now I don't update at all unless I'm forced to do so.
elrod21
08-17-2011, 10:43 AM
Same here Joz. I am still on FireFox 3.6.20.
Incubator
08-17-2011, 11:22 AM
there is something wrong with ff, but they haven't fixed it yet...
Some sites just give you error for no noticeable reason while others work very slow unlike google chrome which always manages to amaze me. But i'm still using ff just because i like it's user interface a lot more. Too bad they don't really fix those issues, they just trow them out under different versions.
I guess they just want to reach bigger version numbers for competitive reasons :\
Dudebro
08-17-2011, 01:25 PM
Great, it forced me to update. Fingers crossed.
Tails
08-17-2011, 01:41 PM
Forced? I just keep on saying ask later.
One thing FF needs to fix is the unbalanced memory. Mine can go up to 500k kb
Dudebro
08-17-2011, 01:43 PM
Forced as in I clicked on the browser today and it came up and said it was already updated. No questions asked. Not sure why it did that though.
Tails
08-17-2011, 01:47 PM
Go to Options, advanced, update, and change the button where it says ask when updates are found DB.
Dudebro
08-17-2011, 02:01 PM
Yeah I know that but why bother if nothing is bad, so far?
tldr: this is stupid.
I think AOX should work if you upgrade to 6. If you have any problems let me know.
1.0 released November 9, 2004
2.0 released October 24, 2006
3.0 released June 17, 2008
4.0 released March 22, 2011
5.0 released June 21, 2011
6.0 released August 16, 2011
The first 3 versions lasted 6.5 years. The last 3 versions lasted less than 6 months.
And they are simultaneously working on versions 3-9 right now.
The what's new list is pathetically small. They shouldn't be releasing new versions like this with such small changes. The upgrades could easily be handled with increment releases as in 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 or with plugins. It is turning into bloatware with all of the mandatory plugins they are adding.
And the reason why your plugins keep saying they are incompatible nearly always has nothing to do with compatibility. When you create a plugin you have to say what version it will work for. If they release a new version every couple months that is almost identical except it has a different product number then it breaks the compatibility check.
---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:16 PM ----------
One thing FF needs to fix is the unbalanced memory. Mine can go up to 500k kbMine too. This is a big problem with FF. IE has a problem of spiking the CPU instead of the RAM. Spiking the RAM will slow most computers down more but spiking the CPU causes the fan to run full speed which I find annoying. That is my main reason I avoid IE.
FF 7, 8 and 9 are all supposed to be released within a couple months of each other too.
FF7 is supposed to reduce memory usage by 50%.
FF8 is supposed to be as fast as Chrome which is pretty fast.
If that is true then FF7 and 8 will really be worth the upgrade. 4, 5 and 6 not so much. I still use 3.6.
ZedIsDead
08-17-2011, 03:25 PM
I played Cameltry with no issue, so AOX does work for me.
Demon-Mask
08-17-2011, 03:42 PM
I was satisfied with 3.6, but I was forced to update to 4, I adjusted to 4, and was forced to update to 5, I am still at 5, and I'll stay on it as long as I can.
I like it. I don't want to update.
Tails
08-30-2011, 04:33 AM
How lame. FF6 removes wheel support. As in you could click your mouse wheel on a link and it'd open a new tab.
Mareeps
08-30-2011, 08:02 AM
Well that sucks, I always use that. What's the point of removing it?
Demon-Mask
08-30-2011, 07:14 PM
How lame. FF6 removes wheel support. As in you could click your mouse wheel on a link and it'd open a new tab.
Still works for me.
I was forced to update, I'm having no problems with it yet.
TheGuardian
08-30-2011, 08:17 PM
How lame. FF6 removes wheel support. As in you could click your mouse wheel on a link and it'd open a new tab.
I'm running Firefox 6 and i can still do that just fine. Dunny why you can't do it. I haven't noticed a single difference between FF5 and FF6, even compatibility with addons. makes me wonder they are doing.
Tails
08-30-2011, 08:21 PM
Really? Mine says 6.0 and can't wheel mouse click at all.
yoshi_star10
08-31-2011, 04:39 PM
I can do the middle mouse click thing, and I didn't know that was possible until you said it.
Also, I just got a message telling me there's another update already
Demon-Mask
08-31-2011, 05:10 PM
I'm running Firefox 6 and i can still do that just fine. Dunny why you can't do it. I haven't noticed a single difference between FF5 and FF6, even compatibility with addons. makes me wonder they are doing.
Maybe tmo of my add-ons were incompatible but, they were just ones I am forced to have installed, I always have them disabled anyway.
I've noticed no real difference either, except maybe that it seems to run just a bit better.
Tails
09-01-2011, 12:11 AM
Now there's another update. :(
Demon-Mask
09-01-2011, 11:32 PM
It told me that but, I didn't update just yet.
Damned Firefox, everything is perfect, except maybe its memory management.
Tails
09-02-2011, 01:50 AM
except maybe its memory management.
Mine can hit 500kb.
Mareeps
09-02-2011, 07:03 AM
Auto upgraded to FF6. I don't notice a difference. Middle click works just fine, so that's good.
Tails
09-02-2011, 07:16 AM
It might be my mouse.. I just hit it real hard and it worked. :(
Demon-Mask
09-03-2011, 12:16 AM
Mine can hit 500kb.
Mine can far surpass that. Sometimes surpassing 2000kb.
Tails
09-29-2011, 11:29 AM
Now Firefox 7.0 :|
CrispyChicken
09-29-2011, 01:32 PM
I downloaded it, but can't tell the differences...
I'm still using 3.6.1 and I'm not moving till I have to.
Tails
09-29-2011, 02:23 PM
I downloaded it, but can't tell the differences...
Better control of the memory leak, and removal of http:// in addess.
CrispyChicken
09-29-2011, 02:29 PM
Oh wow, just noticed the http thing lol.
Tails
09-29-2011, 02:31 PM
I read about it before downloading.
FF 7, 8 and 9 are all supposed to be released within a couple months of each other too.
FF7 is supposed to reduce memory usage by 50%.
FF8 is supposed to be as fast as Chrome which is pretty fast.
If that is true then FF7 and 8 will really be worth the upgrade. 4, 5 and 6 not so much. I still use 3.6.
If it is true that they have reduced the memory usage by 50% then FF7 is the first one since 3.5 that is worth the upgrade.
Demon-Mask
10-02-2011, 12:35 AM
Better control of the memory leak, and removal of http:// in addess.
Wait, the memory management is better? I guess it's already time to update.
CrispyChicken
11-08-2011, 05:58 PM
Just got the 8.0 update...
ZedIsDead
11-08-2011, 07:28 PM
ArcadeOX is working for me in 8.0.
elrod21
11-08-2011, 07:59 PM
Did you have to follow the tweaking directions Kong put out for other upgrades to FireFox ninjatiamat or did it just work?
CrispyChicken
11-08-2011, 08:05 PM
@Elrod- For me, it said it is disabling arcadeox unless user wants to enable it. I enabled it, but it said it is disabling it until user manually installs it. So, I went to a game and it let me re-download ArcadeOx and it worked fine.
elrod21
11-08-2011, 08:08 PM
Cool! I may try it when I get home then. I still have problems watching Beta submissions and I am hoping a new version may or may not help.
Tails
11-09-2011, 01:34 AM
My issue is will my FF7 freezing problem be there?
ZedIsDead
11-09-2011, 06:01 AM
Did you have to follow the tweaking directions Kong put out for other upgrades to FireFox ninjatiamat or did it just work?
I had to uninstall and reinstall AOX. Not that big of a deal, but I should have mentioned that.
Tails
11-22-2011, 01:43 PM
Downloaded FF8. No issues with images freezing now! :D
They claimed FF7 would fix memory leak problems. I have not noticed. Mine is is always using around 1GB of ram.
Tails
11-22-2011, 01:56 PM
304,000 KB here.
Tails
02-13-2012, 06:03 PM
WARNING: Do NOT upgrade to Firefox 10.0.1 the HTML gets screwed up on some pages. Stick with Firefox 10.0.0 and below.
elrod21
02-14-2012, 05:10 PM
Thanks for the warning Tails!
Dudebro
02-14-2012, 05:11 PM
When FF wanted to update it told me that it would make ArcadeOX not work very specifically. I said hell no.
elrod21
02-14-2012, 05:13 PM
So this thread was started in August of 2011, as version 6 had just been released and now in February of 2012 a mere 7 months later we are into the 10 series? What's up with that? :p
Demon-Mask
02-14-2012, 05:41 PM
When FF wanted to update it told me that it would make ArcadeOX not work very specifically. I said hell no.
I'm on FF 10 and ArcadeOX works fine for me, so long as I have a few other addons as well.
Seahawk
02-14-2012, 06:10 PM
When FF wanted to update it told me that it would make ArcadeOX not work very specifically. I said hell no.
It always tells me that when I update. I update anyways and it has never broken.
So this thread was started in August of 2011, as version 6 had just been released and now in February of 2012 a mere 7 months later we are into the 10 series? What's up with that? :p
Early in 2011 the Mozilla group decided to start a more formal cycle of releases of 18 weeks between major versions, rather than the multi-year development periods of previous releases.. Each major release goes through six weeks of nightly, alpha, and beta builds before release.
History of Firefox @ Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Firefox)
I personally don't agree with changing the big number so much, but in the end that is only a cosmetic change. They haven't broken anything with it yet, and it is always getting better, so it's fine by me.
Dudebro
02-14-2012, 06:14 PM
Well that's good to hear but I'll just wait a little longer anyways, no biggie.
When FF wanted to update it told me that it would make ArcadeOX not work very specifically. I said hell no.
Should work. You might need to uninstall and reinstall AOX after upgrading to FF10.
1.0 released November 9, 2004
2.0 released October 24, 2006
3.0 released June 17, 2008
4.0 released March 22, 2011
5.0 released June 21, 2011
6.0 released August 16, 2011
7.0 released September 27, 2011
8.0 released November 8, 2011
9.0 released December 20, 2011
10.0 released January 31, 2012
Firefox plugins like AOX must list all product numbers they support. That system does not work if the product number changes every month or 2 for no reason.
Tails
04-30-2012, 11:23 AM
We're at 12.0 now
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.